Libertarian Papers Submissions: Referees Sought

I am seeking volunteer referees to review 7 draft articles submitted to Libertarian Papers. I list the titles and Abstracts of a few of them below.

If you are potentially interested in reviewing any of these, or if you have any particular referee suggestions for any of them, please contact me. I’d be happy to send blind drafts to anyone who is interested in considering reviewing any of these. (Also, if you are a scholar who is interested in being added to my email list of potential referees for future submissions, please let me know.)

***

1. “Government Through The Eyes of Emergence”
Abstract:  Examining the legitimacy of government by using Reductionist and Emergent principals.  The essay addresses issues on morality, the is – ought fallacy, and the misrepresentation of government.

2. “Choice and Language Shift”
Abstract:
What is the adequate normative response to a growing trend of language shift in a given small linguistic community, either a minority or a majority community in a given liberal country?  This essay attempts to answer this question. I shall analyze carefully whether the members of this small linguistic community choose to continue (or choose not to continue) to use their mother tongue. Carefully examining the ‘choice’ aspect of the decision to shift from language A to B is important for the analysis of a language shift scenario, as a proper understanding of the ‘shifting decision’ is crucial for any attempt to theorize about the proper governmental response to a language-shift scenario.

I shall analyze the decision to shift from one’s mother tongue to a different language, following three different theoretical perspectives:  libertarian, left-liberal, and national/identity.  Following which I shall analyze three potential governmental responses to a language shift scenario from the same three theoretical perspectives:  libertarian, left-liberal and national/identity.  The last part of the essay discusses arguments that may assist us in deciding among the potential governmental responses described.

3. “The Current Evidence for Hayek’s Cultural Group Selection Theory”
Abstract: In this article I summarize Friedrich Hayek’s cultural group selection theory and describe the evidence gathered by current cultural group selection theorists within the behavioral and social sciences supporting Hayek’s main assertions.  Before concluding with a few comments on Hayek as a libertarian, I also describe three ways in which current cultural group selection theory has superseded Hayek’s views.

4. “Reexamining the Federal Monetary Powers”
Abstract: The present paper challenges today’s consensus that the Constitution plays no role in limiting the federal government’s exercise of its monetary powers.  Noting a growing international consensus regarding the need for monetary reform and reviewing the Supreme Court decisions which led to today’s American monetary system, the author argues that unless the Constitution is returned to its proper role in limiting the federal government’s exercise of monetary powers, a legal system may emerge far beyond the control of the American people and absolutely contrary to their best interests.

5. “Praxeological implications for Belief  and the case against Value Pluralism”
Abstract: In this brief essay, I outline the implications of Praxeology for a variety of kinds of Value pluralism. I attempt to show how action, logic and even belief itself, results in a self refutation of these doctrines.

6. “Mises’s Defense of Liberty: A Critique”
Abstract:
What this paper attempts to demonstrate is that, in his treatise Liberalism, Mises’ defense of liberty is incomplete because his reasoning in favor of liberty for all is – not of a moral, but – exclusively of an economic kind. Without a moral justification, Mises’s defense –- once the aim of productivity has been abandoned–is forced to affirm with cold indifference that a society of slaves is no better or worse than one of free men. There exists a more comprehensive defense.

7. “Contemporary Philosophy Versus the Free Society
(from introduction)
: Some would have it that we can have a philosophy of freedom without, well, a philosophy.  In other words, they find it rather pointless to dwell on various philosophical topics, such as free will versus determinism, the problem of knowledge, what is the nature of right conduct and so forth.  Instead they wish to focus on so called practical issues, such as how much prosperity or science or satisfaction is produced in a relatively free versus planned society.  As if these considerations didn’t have some philosophical dimensions.

Without by any means implying that philosophical issues are exclusively central to a defense of a just system of human community life, it would be of some value to see what philosophy can—indeed, needs to—contribute to such a task.  Let me take a brief look at some of the most important of these.

Comment on This Post

*