<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 18. &#8220;Unanswered Quibbles with Fractional Reserve Free Banking&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertarianpapers.org/2011/18-bagus-howden-unanswered-quibbles-with-fractional-reserve-free-banking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertarianpapers.org/2011/18-bagus-howden-unanswered-quibbles-with-fractional-reserve-free-banking/</link>
	<description>A Journal of Libertarian Scholarship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Read</title>
		<link>http://libertarianpapers.org/2011/18-bagus-howden-unanswered-quibbles-with-fractional-reserve-free-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-6724</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianpapers.org/?p=1812#comment-6724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The authors of the article argue strongly that  the distortions caused by increased central bank pumping  are  radically different from those caused by   changes in demand for money under a 100% reserve system.

I’m not sure I fully understanding the case they make.

When central banks pump money:

-	Supply of money exceeds demand at initial price level  and bank interest rates fall.  
-	The lowered interest rates cause mal-investment as projects containing a high proportion of interest in their costs appear more profitable
-	Eventually (when money pumping stops)  prices and interest rates move back to equilibrium
-	By  this stage the mal-investments are revealed as unprofitable and may need to be liquidated

When demand for money decreases under 100% reserve system then assuming some  of the money released from cash balances   goes into  the loan market then the same process will take place as described above.   (Assume  that the change in  cash balances does not affect underlying time preference) 

I guess the effects may not be intense because only a portion of the new  money goes out via the loan market  but nevertheless I am not really seeing the differences as being as fundamental  as stated in the article.  

Can anyone clarify what I am missing?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The authors of the article argue strongly that  the distortions caused by increased central bank pumping  are  radically different from those caused by   changes in demand for money under a 100% reserve system.</p>
<p>I’m not sure I fully understanding the case they make.</p>
<p>When central banks pump money:</p>
<p>-	Supply of money exceeds demand at initial price level  and bank interest rates fall.<br />
-	The lowered interest rates cause mal-investment as projects containing a high proportion of interest in their costs appear more profitable<br />
-	Eventually (when money pumping stops)  prices and interest rates move back to equilibrium<br />
-	By  this stage the mal-investments are revealed as unprofitable and may need to be liquidated</p>
<p>When demand for money decreases under 100% reserve system then assuming some  of the money released from cash balances   goes into  the loan market then the same process will take place as described above.   (Assume  that the change in  cash balances does not affect underlying time preference) </p>
<p>I guess the effects may not be intense because only a portion of the new  money goes out via the loan market  but nevertheless I am not really seeing the differences as being as fundamental  as stated in the article.  </p>
<p>Can anyone clarify what I am missing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What type of Free Banking do we want? &#187; The Cobden Centre</title>
		<link>http://libertarianpapers.org/2011/18-bagus-howden-unanswered-quibbles-with-fractional-reserve-free-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-6723</link>
		<dc:creator>What type of Free Banking do we want? &#187; The Cobden Centre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianpapers.org/?p=1812#comment-6723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Unanswered Quibbles with Fractional Reserve Free Banking [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unanswered Quibbles with Fractional Reserve Free Banking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 17/22 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 283/302 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: libertarianpapers.org @ 2013-05-24 03:46:12 by W3 Total Cache -->