<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 38. &#8220;Discussion Note: Contemporary Philosophy Versus the Free Society&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertarianpapers.org/2010/38-machan-contemporary-philosophy-versus-the-free-society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertarianpapers.org/2010/38-machan-contemporary-philosophy-versus-the-free-society/</link>
	<description>A Journal of Libertarian Scholarship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter J. Preusse</title>
		<link>http://libertarianpapers.org/2010/38-machan-contemporary-philosophy-versus-the-free-society/comment-page-1/#comment-6587</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter J. Preusse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianpapers.org/?p=1556#comment-6587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feeling addressed by Tibor Machans verdict against “some friends of liberty [who] hold, there is . . . one Archimedean point”, I like to recall the explanatory power of the axiom of human action not to “gain a full understanding of the world, including human affairs”, but to understand that only individual humans can act, not some virtual entities like a multitude and that this very solidly lays ground to knowing what’s right or wrong in human social relations as a field of contract vs. command. 

Other than for “a full understanding of the world, including human affairs”, this knowledge does not depend on “the broadest, widest accessible and possible understanding of human life”, namely not on “psychology [and] sociology”, dealing with reality as it is impregnated with all aspects of human descent from the animal world. Keeping these realms intellectually separated must be the very hinge of our dispute with socialist of any colour, IMHO.

Besides, the copy-and-paste-way of text-producing does have its traps, sometimes . . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feeling addressed by Tibor Machans verdict against “some friends of liberty [who] hold, there is . . . one Archimedean point”, I like to recall the explanatory power of the axiom of human action not to “gain a full understanding of the world, including human affairs”, but to understand that only individual humans can act, not some virtual entities like a multitude and that this very solidly lays ground to knowing what’s right or wrong in human social relations as a field of contract vs. command. </p>
<p>Other than for “a full understanding of the world, including human affairs”, this knowledge does not depend on “the broadest, widest accessible and possible understanding of human life”, namely not on “psychology [and] sociology”, dealing with reality as it is impregnated with all aspects of human descent from the animal world. Keeping these realms intellectually separated must be the very hinge of our dispute with socialist of any colour, IMHO.</p>
<p>Besides, the copy-and-paste-way of text-producing does have its traps, sometimes . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 266/285 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: libertarianpapers.org @ 2013-05-18 23:36:10 by W3 Total Cache -->