Comments on: 34. “Feser on Rothbard as a Philosopher”

By: Michael Vogt

Michael Vogt — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:00:20 +0000

Are we to expect a rebuttal to Feser’s reply?

I want to read more of Gerard Casey’s stuff. Loved his “Indefensibility of Political Representation” paper.

By: Stephan Kinsella

Stephan Kinsella — Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:02:58 +0000

Feser replies to Casey here.

By: "Feser on Rothbard as a Philosopher," by Gerard Casey [Libertarian Papers, Vol. 1 (2009), Art. No. 34] | Austrian Economics Blog

Sat, 08 Aug 2009 22:44:14 +0000

[...] (2009), Art. No. 34] BY admin ON August 8th, 2009 Libertarian Papers, Vol. 1 (2009), Art. No. 34: “Feser on Rothbard as a Philosopher,” by Gerard [...]

By: Roderick T. Long

Roderick T. Long — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:19:50 +0000

Sukrit,

That’s not a typo, it’s just British (and 19th-century American) usage.

By: "Feser on Rothbard as a Philosopher," by Gerard Casey [Libertarian Papers, Vol. 1 (2009), Art. No. 34] | syntech finance blog

Sat, 08 Aug 2009 09:09:55 +0000

[...] 7th, 2009 Goto comments Leave a comment Libertarian Papers, Vol. 1 (2009), Art. No. 34: “Feser on Rothbard as a Philosopher,” by Gerard [...]

By: Sukrit

Sukrit — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 07:37:26 +0000

There’s a typo: “Feser’s criticism fails of it purpose”.

Should be “Feser’s criticism fails in its purpose”.