<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 19. &#8220;Argumentation Ethics and The Philosophy of Freedom&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/19-van-dun-argumentation-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/19-van-dun-argumentation-ethics/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=19-van-dun-argumentation-ethics</link>
	<description>An Online Journal for Libertarian Scholarship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 16:41:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Barry</title>
		<link>http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/19-van-dun-argumentation-ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-6701</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 14:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianpapers.org/?p=935#comment-6701</guid>
		<description>&quot;Freedom among likes is the presupposition of argumentation, and cannot be denied in an argumentation.&quot;

It strikes me that the approach in this article is to begin with an unity of degree of man.  From that unity follows follows every aspect of argumentation ethics which cannot be overturned in the subsequent argument.

May it be said that argumentation ethics are &#039;self evident&#039; truths?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Freedom among likes is the presupposition of argumentation, and cannot be denied in an argumentation.&#8221;</p>
<p>It strikes me that the approach in this article is to begin with an unity of degree of man.  From that unity follows follows every aspect of argumentation ethics which cannot be overturned in the subsequent argument.</p>
<p>May it be said that argumentation ethics are &#8216;self evident&#8217; truths?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#201;tica de la argumentaci&#243;n y libertad: una gu&#237;a breve - Mises Daily en español</title>
		<link>http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/19-van-dun-argumentation-ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-6700</link>
		<dc:creator>&#201;tica de la argumentaci&#243;n y libertad: una gu&#237;a breve - Mises Daily en español</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 19:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianpapers.org/?p=935#comment-6700</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Argumentation Ethics and The Philosophy of Freedom&#8221;, by Frank Van Dun. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &ldquo;Argumentation Ethics and The Philosophy of Freedom&rdquo;, by Frank Van Dun. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian Papers at Six Months &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/19-van-dun-argumentation-ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-2269</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian Papers at Six Months &#124; Austrian Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianpapers.org/?p=935#comment-2269</guid>
		<description>[...] scholars&#8211;as well as from established libertarian intellectuals such as Narveson, Higgs, van Dun, Salin, Kukathas, Block, and Machan. And, astoundingly, in our first half year we have published [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scholars&#8211;as well as from established libertarian intellectuals such as Narveson, Higgs, van Dun, Salin, Kukathas, Block, and Machan. And, astoundingly, in our first half year we have published [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/19-van-dun-argumentation-ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianpapers.org/?p=935#comment-268</guid>
		<description>Yes he has, for example this one;
http://www.reasonpapers.com/pdf/11/rp_11_2.pdf

And in a more indirect sense;
http://www.rothbard.be/english/articles/pragmatism-and-liberty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes he has, for example this one;<br />
<a href="http://www.reasonpapers.com/pdf/11/rp_11_2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.reasonpapers.com/pdf/11/rp_11_2.pdf</a></p>
<p>And in a more indirect sense;<br />
<a href="http://www.rothbard.be/english/articles/pragmatism-and-liberty" rel="nofollow">http://www.rothbard.be/english/articles/pragmatism-and-liberty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton Reeder</title>
		<link>http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/19-van-dun-argumentation-ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton Reeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianpapers.org/?p=935#comment-266</guid>
		<description>This was an interesting article. Does the author have more English-language material on this subject, and if so what is recommended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was an interesting article. Does the author have more English-language material on this subject, and if so what is recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching using disk: basic

Served from: libertarianpapers.org @ 2012-05-17 02:16:51 -->
