Comments on: 18. “Grounding Political Debate”

By: WARNING: Libertarianism Is NOT … « Economics.org.au

WARNING: Libertarianism Is NOT … « Economics.org.au — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:59:42 +0000

[...] an idealist, a romantic or a utopian. He is the author of Mencken’s Conservatism and “Grounding Political Debate.” The lack of any attention that those two brilliant pieces has received confirms his point [...]

By: Exclusive Ross Gittins Interview « Economics.org.au

Exclusive Ross Gittins Interview « Economics.org.au — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:17:59 +0000

[...] Ross Gittins Interview Other entries featuring Benjamin Marks» Benjamin Marks, author of a critique of happiness studies and a review of Gittinomics, and Economics.org.au editor: Thank you, Mr Gittins, for making your [...]

By: Appendix 1: Arguments Mencken Did Not Use That Justify His Position — MC Part 16 | Mencken.info

Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:19:15 +0000

[...] in my essay, “Grounding Political Debate,”9 I address some common errors by libertarians that mislead them into believing: that [...]

By: Romanticism Rests on Two False Premises — MC Part 6 | Mencken.info

Romanticism Rests on Two False Premises — MC Part 6 | Mencken.info — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 23:00:21 +0000

[...] Fan, Act III. [↩]Notes on Democracy, p. 31. [↩]For more on this, see Benjamin Marks, “Grounding Political Debate,” Libertarian Papers 1, 18 (2009). [↩] This entry was posted in Mencken's Conservatism. [...]