http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/16-on-a-recent-theory-of-legal-obligation/ A Journal of Libertarian Scholarship Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:59:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/16-on-a-recent-theory-of-legal-obligation/comment-page-1/#comment-6325 Publius Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:51:38 +0000 http://libertarianpapers.org/?p=877#comment-6325 Why bother with a theory when you can have the absolute real thing. The US Supreme Court defined where American Citizens have rights and obligations and how they are to be defined in the case of Chrysler v Brown 441 US 281. All at are seriously interested in pursuit of liberty really need to read and understand this case. Only SUBSTANTIVE Regulations have a nexus to the US Constitution and can alter your liberty and or property.
Substantive regulations can be found parenthesis following the relevant regulation specified in the US Code of Federal Regulations. Material referenced in square brackets is of an administrative or procedural nature. Administrative or Procedural regulations do not pertain to the rights or obligations of the individual.
Good luck.

]]> http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/16-on-a-recent-theory-of-legal-obligation/comment-page-1/#comment-2280 Libertarian Papers at Six Months | Austrian Economics Blog Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:08:22 +0000 http://libertarianpapers.org/?p=877#comment-2280 [...] case of Leoni, obscure and unavailable) works by towering thinkers such as Mises, Rothbard, Bruno Leoni, and Adolf [...]

]]>